Confederation and Constitution Essays -- Governmental American History

Confederation and governanceAfter the American Revolution, a new government activity had to be established. The Constitution that was written took part away from the peck. It led to ascents from poor deal and farmers.Daniel Shays, a former basal Army captain, led a rebellion with farmers, against laws which were not fair to the poor. They protested against uppity taxes on property, polling taxes which obtained the poor from voting, unfair actions by the court of common requests, the gamy cost of lawsuits, and the lack of a stable currency. They wanted the government to gist paper money, since it is cheaper then gold and silver coins. Once retired George Washington perceive of this, he immediately went to Massachusetts to stop it. He was completely ball over to see the people fighting against the coarse which fought to free those men. What a blessedness for the advocates of despotism to find that we are incapable of governing ourselves, and that systems founded on the r ear end of equal liberty are merely ideal and fallacious. (George Washington Expresses disheartenment 1786) He said this to the rebels who then stopped and the rebellion was crushed.After Shays rebellion collapsed, the government realized that they need a new constitution and to gird the Articles of Confederation. This was a long and hard decision on whether to give the people the right to voice their opinions or not. Mixed views on the subject were minded(p) so it was very difficult to come to a conclusion. Mr. Sherman of Connecticut unlike the election by the people, insisting that it ought to be by the state legislatures. The people, he said, immediately should have as little to do as may be or so the government. They want lack information and are constantly reasonable to be misled. (The Debate on Representation in Congress 1787). Mr. Sherman is truism that people should not have anything to do with what the government has to do. They unless catch information wrong and can be misled and misdirected into something that can be deadly for the country.Mr. Gerry of Massachusetts believes the evils we experience flow from the excess of democracy. term Mr. Mason of Virginia argued potently for an election of the larger branch by the people. The representatives of these states viewed different ideas on democracy. well-nigh wanted the people to have more of a say objet dart others wanted to... ...ystem is without the security of a bill of rights. These are objections which are not local, but apply equally to all the states. (Elbridge Gerry, Letter to President of Senate and verbaliser of House of Representatives of Massachusetts, October 18, 1787). Gerry is saying that no government can represent the people, completely the people can represent the people. Its not only in Massachusetts that this problem of representation, its all thirteen states.During the time the Constitution was written, the Founding Fathers believed the government was based on p roperty. Men who have no property lack the necessary stake in an orderly bon ton to make stable or reliable citizens (The American Political Tradition). While John Adams said there could be no free government without a democratical branch in the constitution John Jay felt The people who own the country ought to govern it. This proves that there were many mixed feelings about the Constitution, but still, the power went from the many to the few. There are only a hand full of people that can run the country during the time the Constitution was written, and even today, but the ratio between politicians and farmers is great.